- TsExtractor is now based on ParsableByteArray rather than BitArray.
This makes is much clearer that, for the most part, data is byte
aligned. It will allow us to optimize TsExtractor without worrying
about arbitrary bit offsets.
- BitArray is renamed ParsableBitArray for consistency, and is now
exclusively for bit-stream level reading.
- There are some temporary methods in ParsableByteArray that should be
cleared up once the optimizations are in place.
Issue: #278
This is the start of a sequence of changes to fix the ref'd
github issue. Currently TsExtractor involves multiple memory
copy steps:
DataSource->Ts_BitArray->Pes_BitArray->Sample->SampleHolder
This is inefficient, but more importantly, the copy into
Sample is problematic, because Samples are of dynamically
varying size. The way we end up expanding Sample objects to
be large enough to hold the data being written means that we
end up gradually expanding all Sample objects in the pool
(which wastes memory), and that we generate a lot of GC churn,
particularly when switching to a higher quality which can
trigger all Sample objects to expand.
The fix will be to reduce the copy steps to:
DataSource->TsPacket->SampleHolder
We will track Pes and Sample data with lists of pointers into
TsPackets, rather than actually copying the data. We will
recycle these pointers.
The following steps are approximately how the refactor will
progress:
1. Start reducing use of BitArray. It's going to be way too
complicated to track bit-granularity offsets into multiple packets,
and allow reading across packet boundaries. In practice reads
from Ts packets are all byte aligned except for small sections,
so we'll move over to using ParsableByteArray instead, so we
only need to track byte offsets.
2. Move TsExtractor to use ParsableByteArray except for small
sections where we really need bit-granularity offsets.
3. Do the actual optimization.
Issue: #278
