From ed0b4bef10bb6f48e441369700182b3a28809be5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=94=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=8F=D0=BD=20=D0=9F=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B0?= =?UTF-8?q?=D1=83=D0=B7=D0=BE=D0=B2?= Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:53:24 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?Typo=20a=E2=86=92an?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- docs/vdir.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/vdir.rst b/docs/vdir.rst index 37223ef..fe84ac0 100644 --- a/docs/vdir.rst +++ b/docs/vdir.rst @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ collections for faster search and lookup. The reason items' filenames don't contain any extra information is simple: The solutions presented induced duplication of data, where one duplicate might -become out of date because of bad implementations. As it stands right now, a +become out of date because of bad implementations. As it stands right now, an index format could be formalized separately though. vdirsyncer doesn't really have to bother about efficient item lookup, because