Test that HDR editing succeeds on devices supporting HDR editing, tone maps on
devices supporting tone mapping, and throws exceptions on all other devices.
Also, only restrict HDR editing and tone mapping support to API 31+ only when
transcoding, not for all transformations.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472958965
(cherry picked from commit 8ee2121627)
Test that HDR editing succeeds on devices supporting HDR editing, tone maps on
devices supporting tone mapping, and throws exceptions on all other devices.
Also, only restrict HDR editing and tone mapping support to API 31+ only when
transcoding, not for all transformations.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472958965
(cherry picked from commit 0d8fd3d4fc)
Add support for multi-value tags based on null terminators.
These are specific to ID3v2.4, but is backwards compatible with
ID3v2.3, so no version checks are needed.
The exception fires when intent resolution fails to find a service which declares an appropriate intent-filter. The existing message is confusing; it's trying to say that the service couldn't be found but the double negative renders it incorrect.
#cleanup
#minor-release
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472736740
(cherry picked from commit 15d3d74e16)
If the back buffer is using too much memory, there is a risk
playback could get stuck because LoadControl refuses to load
further data. This eventually results in a stuck-buffering
playback error.
We can detect this case, clear the back buffer and then ask
the LoadControl again to avoid failing playback in such a case.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472679797
(cherry picked from commit 125646e4c9)
If the back buffer is using too much memory, there is a risk
playback could get stuck because LoadControl refuses to load
further data. This eventually results in a stuck-buffering
playback error.
We can detect this case, clear the back buffer and then ask
the LoadControl again to avoid failing playback in such a case.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472679797
(cherry picked from commit 310e0fec5c)
The stream offset is used to calculate the presentation time of
a metadata object when reading and later when playing, to calculate
the current presentation time to decide whether to send the metadata
to the output.
Accordingly, the presentation time of a pending metadata that has been
calculated with a given offset needs to be recalculated when the
stream offset changes.
#minor-release
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472499943
(cherry picked from commit 5a1223777c)
The stream offset is used to calculate the presentation time of
a metadata object when reading and later when playing, to calculate
the current presentation time to decide whether to send the metadata
to the output.
Accordingly, the presentation time of a pending metadata that has been
calculated with a given offset needs to be recalculated when the
stream offset changes.
#minor-release
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472499943
(cherry picked from commit 0896c4dd36)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (2 times)
* This catch block catches an exception and re-throws another, but swallows the caught exception rather than setting it as a cause. This can make debugging harder.
(see http://go/bugpattern/UnusedException)
* This comment contains Javadoc or HTML tags, but isn't started with a double asterisk (/**); is it meant to be Javadoc?
(see http://go/bugpattern/AlmostJavadoc)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472255768
(cherry picked from commit 3a2e0d3717)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472254253
(cherry picked from commit 8396647896)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472254253
(cherry picked from commit 573ad66f2f)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472252461
(cherry picked from commit dfdcf76daf)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 472252461
(cherry picked from commit 83485bc509)
The assertion asserts against a `Period` and an `AdPlaybackState` which actually
asserts against a resolved ad which is what `ExoPlayerImplInternal` does later and
what gives us a `SEEK_ADJUSTMENT`. However, this assertion is not required at the
moment of masking, because we are sure that the resolved seek results in a content
period and never an ad period.
#minor-release
Issue: androidx/media#122
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471827072
(cherry picked from commit 73f86682e9)
