shouldPassthrough's internal checks seem to be check whether we should *not*
pass through, which seemed a bit like a confusing double-negative to me.
shouldTranscode is slightly more clear, by instead returning true when we do
want to transcode.
No functional changes intended.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471753771
(cherry picked from commit 1a4cd549a4)
shouldPassthrough's internal checks seem to be check whether we should *not*
pass through, which seemed a bit like a confusing double-negative to me.
shouldTranscode is slightly more clear, by instead returning true when we do
want to transcode.
No functional changes intended.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471753771
(cherry picked from commit 7085c2fa6e)
3b0d2c1586 made `shouldPassthrough` always return false for `enableHdrVideoEditing`:
>We force using `FrameEditor` (no passthrough) to avoid the need to select another edit operation, and use the new shaders. The `EGLContext` and `EGLSurface` also need to be set up differently for this path.
However, this was introduced before the `videoNeedsEncoding` setting was introduced in 3f615040c0. That setting should apply to HDR videos as much as SDR videos.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471569853
(cherry picked from commit 94713a8ffb)
3b0d2c1586 made `shouldPassthrough` always return false for `enableHdrVideoEditing`:
>We force using `FrameEditor` (no passthrough) to avoid the need to select another edit operation, and use the new shaders. The `EGLContext` and `EGLSurface` also need to be set up differently for this path.
However, this was introduced before the `videoNeedsEncoding` setting was introduced in 3f615040c0. That setting should apply to HDR videos as much as SDR videos.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471569853
(cherry picked from commit bc88f8be54)
Replacing remaining usage of MoreExecutors.directExecutor. This allows the service to be switched to run in another process and the app still works the same as if it is running in the same process.
Issue: androidx/media#100
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471547177
(cherry picked from commit 9a6745431a)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471198016
(cherry picked from commit bac7d697c3)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (3 times)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471198016
(cherry picked from commit 6d3cc01d79)
In particular, make it a bit more clear that "rendering" and "releasing" frames are
related concepts, and how they differ from one another in conjunction with frame
dropping.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471037733
(cherry picked from commit e6a1936ba9)
In particular, make it a bit more clear that "rendering" and "releasing" frames are
related concepts, and how they differ from one another in conjunction with frame
dropping.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471037733
(cherry picked from commit 69714e5f8e)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (19 times)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471022923
(cherry picked from commit 674b3d4575)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment) (19 times)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 471022923
(cherry picked from commit b48ca6e040)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470953422
(cherry picked from commit f26e5d4c21)
* Non-standard parameter comment; prefer `/* paramName= */ arg`
(see http://go/bugpattern/ParameterComment)
This CL looks good? Just LGTM and Approve it!
This CL doesn’t look good? This is what you can do:
* Revert this CL, by replying "REVERT: <provide reason>"
* File a bug under go/error-prone-bug for category ErrorProneStyle if there's an issue with the CL content.
* File a bug under go/rosie-bug if there's an issue with how the CL was managed.
* Revert this CL and not get a CL that cleans up these paths in the future by
replying "BLOCKLIST: <provide reason>". This is not reversible! We recommend to
opt out the respective paths in your CL Robot configuration instead:
go/clrobot-opt-out.
This CL was generated by CL Robot - a tool that cleans up code findings
(go/clrobot). The affected code paths have been enabled for CL Robot in //depot/google3/java/com/google/android/libraries/media/METADATA which is reachable following include_presubmits from //depot/google3/third_party/java_src/android_libs/media/METADATA.
Anything wrong with the signup? File a bug at go/clrobot-bug.
#codehealth
Tested:
Local presubmit tests passed.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470953422
(cherry picked from commit 52d32be8df)
TL;DR: we should check if there are new frames available to queue to the
ExternalTextureProcessor before actually queueing a frame.
The overall flow on the external texture processor:
- `SurfaceTexture.onFrameAvailable` is called on `ExtTexMgr`, and
- it calls `updateTexImage()`, and sets `frame`
- it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()`
- the frame is queued to `ExtTexProc` if `frame` is set
- From `ExtTexProc.queueInputFrame()`:
- notifies the `frameProcessorListener` of available frame
- notifies the `inputListener` of `onReadyToAcceptInputFrame`
- (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()`
again
-- Parallelly --
- `ExtTexProc` calls `inputListener.onInputFrameProcessed`, when the frame is
released
- (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), sets `frame` to `null`
*Problem*
This logic relies on `frame` to be cleared at the right time.
In transformer, it's OK b/c `ExtTexProc` release the frame immediately in
`queueInputFrame()` and calls `onInputFrameProcessed` which also reset `frame`
But in previewing, the frame is not released for a while, up to 10 ms.
In this case, `frame` will not reset in this 10 ms, and
`maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()` is repeatedly queueing the same input frame.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470211620
(cherry picked from commit a8c54dd378)
TL;DR: we should check if there are new frames available to queue to the
ExternalTextureProcessor before actually queueing a frame.
The overall flow on the external texture processor:
- `SurfaceTexture.onFrameAvailable` is called on `ExtTexMgr`, and
- it calls `updateTexImage()`, and sets `frame`
- it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()`
- the frame is queued to `ExtTexProc` if `frame` is set
- From `ExtTexProc.queueInputFrame()`:
- notifies the `frameProcessorListener` of available frame
- notifies the `inputListener` of `onReadyToAcceptInputFrame`
- (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), it calls `maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()`
again
-- Parallelly --
- `ExtTexProc` calls `inputListener.onInputFrameProcessed`, when the frame is
released
- (`ExtTexMgr` is the listener), sets `frame` to `null`
*Problem*
This logic relies on `frame` to be cleared at the right time.
In transformer, it's OK b/c `ExtTexProc` release the frame immediately in
`queueInputFrame()` and calls `onInputFrameProcessed` which also reset `frame`
But in previewing, the frame is not released for a while, up to 10 ms.
In this case, `frame` will not reset in this 10 ms, and
`maybeQueueFrameToExtTexProc()` is repeatedly queueing the same input frame.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470211620
(cherry picked from commit 91709831ed)
Native multidex can only be used for binaries with minSdkVersion of 21 or higher, but minSdkVersion was specified to 16.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470004102
(cherry picked from commit a395b23d98)
Native multidex can only be used for binaries with minSdkVersion of 21 or higher, but minSdkVersion was specified to 16.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470004102
(cherry picked from commit d260b0c2a0)
Native multidex can only be used for binaries with minSdkVersion of 21 or higher, but minSdkVersion was specified to 16.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470003836
(cherry picked from commit 142d1c062c)
Native multidex can only be used for binaries with minSdkVersion of 21 or higher, but minSdkVersion was specified to 16.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 470003836
(cherry picked from commit 5b3f320230)
Use the PQ OETF and EOTF to ensure that intermediate fragment shader operations
using PQ are in linear BT.2020 rather than PQ and HLG-1 BT.2020.
Also, swap the OETF and EOTF in shaders, as they were used incorrectly before
Manually tested by verifying transformer demo HLG and PQ videos look the same with and without this CL, including with a BitmapOverlayProcessor enabled to test flows both with one MatrixTransformationProcessor that skips HDR TFs, and with one that doesn't.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 469736067
(cherry picked from commit a2139109e3)
Use the PQ OETF and EOTF to ensure that intermediate fragment shader operations
using PQ are in linear BT.2020 rather than PQ and HLG-1 BT.2020.
Also, swap the OETF and EOTF in shaders, as they were used incorrectly before
Manually tested by verifying transformer demo HLG and PQ videos look the same with and without this CL, including with a BitmapOverlayProcessor enabled to test flows both with one MatrixTransformationProcessor that skips HDR TFs, and with one that doesn't.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 469736067
(cherry picked from commit 2ad07e88ee)
