mirror of
https://github.com/samsonjs/samhuri.net.git
synced 2026-03-25 09:05:47 +00:00
Sami Samhuri
007b1058b6
Replace the Swift site generator with a Ruby and Phlex implementation. Loads site and projects from TOML, derive site metadata from posts. Migrate from make to bake and add standardrb and code coverage tasks. Update CI and docs to match the new workflow, and remove unused assets/dependencies plus obsolete tooling.
41 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
Title: "Working with the Zend Framework"
|
|
Author: Sami Samhuri
|
|
Date: "6th July, 2006"
|
|
Timestamp: 2006-07-06T07:36:00-07:00
|
|
Tags: coding, technology, php, framework, php, seekport, zend
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
At [Seekport](http://translate.google.ca/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seekport&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dseekport%26client%3Dsafari%26rls%3Den) I'm currently working on an app to handle
|
|
the config of their business-to-business search engine. It's web-based and I'm using PHP, since
|
|
that's what they're re-doing the front-end in. Right now it's a big mess of Perl, the main
|
|
developer (for the front-end) is gone, and they're having trouble managing it. I have read
|
|
through it, and it's pretty dismal. They have config mixed with logic and duplicated code all
|
|
over the place. There's an 1100 line sub in one of the perl modules. Agh!
|
|
|
|
Anyway, I've been looking at basically every damn PHP framework there is and most of them
|
|
aren't that great (sorry to the devs, but they're not). It's not really necessary for my little
|
|
project, but it helps in both writing and maintaining it. Many of them are unusable because
|
|
they're still beta and have bugs, and I need to develop the app not debug a framework. Some of
|
|
them are nice, but not really what I'm looking for, such as [Qcodo](http://www.qcodo.com/), which otherwise look really cool.
|
|
|
|
[CakePHP](http://cakephp.org/) and [Symfony](http://www.symfony-project.com/) seem to want to be
|
|
[Rails](http://www.rubyonrails.org/) so badly, but fall short in many ways, code beauty
|
|
being the most obvious one.
|
|
|
|
I could go on about them all, I looked at over a dozen and took at least 5 of them for a
|
|
test-drive. The only one I really think has a chance to be *the* PHP framework is the
|
|
[Zend Framework](http://framework.zend.com/). I really don't find it that amazing, but
|
|
it feels right, whereas the others feel very thrown-together. In other words, it does a good
|
|
job of not making it feel like PHP. ;-)
|
|
|
|
Nothing they're doing is revolutionary, and I question the inclusion of things like PDF
|
|
handling when they don't even seem to have relationships figured out, but it provides a nice
|
|
level of convenience above PHP without forcing you into their pattern of thinking. A lot of the
|
|
other frameworks I tried seemed like one, big, unbreakable unit. With Zend I can really tell
|
|
that nothing is coupled.
|
|
|
|
So I'll probably be writing some notes here about my experience with this framework. I also
|
|
hope to throw Adobe's [Spry](http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/) into the mix.
|
|
That little JS library is a lot of fun.
|
|
|