Sami Samhuri
007b1058b6
Replace the Swift site generator with a Ruby and Phlex implementation. Loads site and projects from TOML, derive site metadata from posts. Migrate from make to bake and add standardrb and code coverage tasks. Update CI and docs to match the new workflow, and remove unused assets/dependencies plus obsolete tooling.
2.5 KiB
| Title | Author | Date | Timestamp | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Funny how code can be beautiful | Sami Samhuri | 30th April, 2007 | 2007-04-30T07:07:00-07:00 | haskell |
While reading a Haskell tutorial I came across the following code for defining the Fibonacci numbers:
fib = 1 : 1 : [ a + b | (a, b) <- zip fib (tail fib) ]
After reading it a few times and understanding how it works I couldn’t help but think how beautiful it is. I don’t mean that it’s aesthetically pleasing to me; the beautiful part is the meaning and simplicity. Lazy evaluation is sweet.
Haskell is the most challenging real language I have tried to wrap my head around. I haven’t done much with any functional languages yet but they are truly fascinating. I’m beginning to understand monads[1] but I’m quite sure I don’t see the whole picture yet.
Erlang looks like it may be more suited to real world apps so I would like to learn that some time. The pragmatic guys have a book on Erlang in the works, and I love every book of theirs which I have read.
Going deeper down the functional rabbit-hole you’ll find things like this polyglot quine, which absolutely blows my mind. I used to be impressed by the JAPH sigs or some of the various obfuscated contest winners but that first one definitely cleans the rest up with a perfect 10 in geekiness.
[1] The following links have all been helpful while trying to wrap my head around monads.
- A Gentle Introduction to Haskell (link is directly to chapter 9)
- What the hell are Monads?
- Monads on WikiBooks
- Monads for the Working Haskell Programmer